On June 8 California voters will decide what they think about Proposition 17, but until then the debate continues. Supporters say it will help more than 80% of the state’s residents because they could keep their continuous coverage discounts with them when they switch car insurance providers. Drivers say as much as $250 a year with these benefits, but currently the benefits are lost when you switch to a new insurance carrier according to an LA Times report.

Those against Proposition 17 say it will drive up costs, especially for people who gave up driving because of various reasons ranging from military service to medical conditions. Those against the legislation say new drivers and those with bad driving records would also face higher costs. Both sides have been lobbying hard, with insurance companies spending millions of dollars on ad campaigns in the weeks before the vote.

Business groups are largely backing the proposition because of its added freedom for changing insurance providers because they believe it would add more competition. Others say the new law would undermine an old on that strengthened the link between insurance costs and the risk certain drivers hold, according to Richard Holober of the Consumer Federation of California. “It is discriminatory against people who are down on their luck and serving their country,” Holober said to the LA Times. Holober says that drivers who suspend their insurance for more than 90 days because they’re not driving would then have to pay surcharges to reactivate their car insurance coverage.

A surcharge like that would impact drivers like Ben Gartner, a teacher who stopped driving for a year and a half when gas prices soared. Gartner worries he’d have to pay a huge surcharge if Proposition 17 passes. “I would feel it was very unfair if I had to pay more for insurance because I wasn’t driving. I didn’t have anything negative on my driving record. I did it to save money,” he said to the LA Times. But supporters say that won’t happen. “California is the most highly regulated insurance market in the country, with significant consumer protections, and our opponents know darn well the Department of Insurance would never approve rates with the surcharges they allege would occur,” said Mike Darrell to the LA Times, executive director of the Sacramento-based Alliance of Insurance Agents and Brokers.

A congressional committee approved a bill that would overhaul the National Flood Insurance Program. This move impacts more than five million homes and businesses that are sitting in flood-prone areas, according to a Reuters report. The program had recently expired, causing issues for anyone wanting to sell or buy property in a flood zone.  Here’s a look at the changes that would happen if it is approved by the House and Senate:

• It would continue the program for five years until September 30, 2015.
• New rate maps for flood zones would be delayed. This would help homeowners facing higher insurance rates.
• The bill would also overhaul the program’s administrators so it can function more efficiently.

Democrat Maxine Waters chairs the subcommittee working on this issue and says they have figured out cost-saving methods which is important since the program has carried massive debt since the destructive 2004 and 2005 hurricane seasons. “The focus on NFIP should be on providing coverage for those vulnerable to natural disasters, not to subsidize the wealthiest Americans, so we are phasing out premium subsidies for second homes and vacation homes, which will save the program a lot of money,” Waters said in a statement according to Reuters. The House of Representatives Financial Services Committee approved the bill.

Insurance providers including Allstate, Travelers, Hartford Financial Services and Fidelity National Financial all have a big involvement in the National Flood Insurance Program. The program is administered by FEMA to provide flood coverage. They buy the coverage from about 90 companies that sell policies and collect premiums for the government. Those premiums are given to FEMA. “A long-term reauthorization of the NFIP is extremely important, especially for Americans living in flood-prone areas,” Blain Rethmeier, spokesman for the American Insurance Association, said in a Reuters report. The Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers of America, also known as Big “I”, issued a statement of support for the move. “The continued short term extensions of the NFIP have caused considerable confusion in the marketplace,” said Charles Symington, senior vice president of government affairs for the Big “I”. “We strongly support the Financial Services Committee’s efforts to pass a long term extension of this important program and hope that the full House and Senate will consider this legislation promptly.” 

You could be overlooking an important way to save on your homeowners’ insurance. America’s economy is forcing many households to find new ways to be thrifty. Looking at the documents give n to you by your home insurance company can yield oft-ignored opportunities for thrift.

Most people know that they can reduce their homeowners’ insurance rates by changing their policies to have a bigger deductible. However, many people don’t know how many ways there are to get credits with their home insurance provider. With these credits, home insurance providers reward people who choose to improve their homes by lowering their annual rates, without increasing deductibles. Unlike the situation in which you lower the premium by increasing the deductible, you don’t stand to lose anything by taking advantage of these credits. You only stand to benefit.